<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prospects and Projects &#8211; Projecting the 2013 Kernels. Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knuckleballsblog.com/2013/01/07/prospects-and-projects-projecting-the-2013-kernels-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knuckleballsblog.com/2013/01/07/prospects-and-projects-projecting-the-2013-kernels-part-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=prospects-and-projects-projecting-the-2013-kernels-part-1</link>
	<description>&#34;Like butterflies with hiccups&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Knuckleballs &#8211; Prospects and Projects: Projecting the 2013 Kernels, Part 6</title>
		<link>http://knuckleballsblog.com/2013/01/07/prospects-and-projects-projecting-the-2013-kernels-part-1/#comment-31360</link>
		<dc:creator>Knuckleballs &#8211; Prospects and Projects: Projecting the 2013 Kernels, Part 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knuckleballsblog.com/?p=14731#comment-31360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part 1 &#8211; catchers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 &#8211; catchers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Crikket</title>
		<link>http://knuckleballsblog.com/2013/01/07/prospects-and-projects-projecting-the-2013-kernels-part-1/#comment-30925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Crikket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 05:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knuckleballsblog.com/?p=14731#comment-30925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy, I&#039;m not enough of an expert on the rest of the organization to judge whether their Class A catching is weaker than any position elsewhere, but it&#039;s clearly the weak link in Cedar Rapids. That might be a bit concerning, given how strong the pitching could be here.

I don&#039;t know any more about the rookie level catchers than what I can see on their stat lines and bios, but it&#039;s pretty hard to see that Altobelli or Cross have shown much to make us think they&#039;ll push Rodriguez and Arias. That could be one reason the Twins are working with Grimes behind the plate, I guess. I haven&#039;t heard anything yet about how he looked in Instructs, have you? I do think you&#039;re right about him likely staying in Ft Myers for a while, anyway.

If anyone does push those three for time in CR this season, I would bet on Santy, I guess, just because it looks like he at least knows which end of the bat to grip anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, I&#8217;m not enough of an expert on the rest of the organization to judge whether their Class A catching is weaker than any position elsewhere, but it&#8217;s clearly the weak link in Cedar Rapids. That might be a bit concerning, given how strong the pitching could be here.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know any more about the rookie level catchers than what I can see on their stat lines and bios, but it&#8217;s pretty hard to see that Altobelli or Cross have shown much to make us think they&#8217;ll push Rodriguez and Arias. That could be one reason the Twins are working with Grimes behind the plate, I guess. I haven&#8217;t heard anything yet about how he looked in Instructs, have you? I do think you&#8217;re right about him likely staying in Ft Myers for a while, anyway.</p>
<p>If anyone does push those three for time in CR this season, I would bet on Santy, I guess, just because it looks like he at least knows which end of the bat to grip anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://knuckleballsblog.com/2013/01/07/prospects-and-projects-projecting-the-2013-kernels-part-1/#comment-30921</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knuckleballsblog.com/?p=14731#comment-30921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JC,

I just checked out my projections and they look pretty similar.  Part of me wonders if Grimes will be held back, regardless, to get in a lot of extra work.  Being 1 of 3 he&#039;s not going to get a ton of reps and catching the back fields might be more productive, though neither Arias or Rodriguez appear overly deserving of being a &quot;starter&quot;.  You wonder if a guy like Altobelli or Cross has it in them to make the leap.   

If I had to place money on what will happen, I&#039;d say Arias and Rodriguez to start the year.  Grimes comes up later (May?) and Rodriguez is out of the organization with Altobelli a call away in case or injury or ineffectiveness.

Is it a stretch to say that this may be the weakest position of any affiliate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JC,</p>
<p>I just checked out my projections and they look pretty similar.  Part of me wonders if Grimes will be held back, regardless, to get in a lot of extra work.  Being 1 of 3 he&#8217;s not going to get a ton of reps and catching the back fields might be more productive, though neither Arias or Rodriguez appear overly deserving of being a &#8220;starter&#8221;.  You wonder if a guy like Altobelli or Cross has it in them to make the leap.   </p>
<p>If I had to place money on what will happen, I&#8217;d say Arias and Rodriguez to start the year.  Grimes comes up later (May?) and Rodriguez is out of the organization with Altobelli a call away in case or injury or ineffectiveness.</p>
<p>Is it a stretch to say that this may be the weakest position of any affiliate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
